Cult of Alcohol | Rabbi Pruzansky's Blog

The Wall Street Journal ten days ago (February 9, 2013) featured a front page article entitled ??After these Jewish Prayer Services, Things Come ?To Life? at Open Bar,? with the sub-heading, ?To Woo Worshippers, Synagogues Compete with Food and Booze.? The article was quite expansive about a number of shuls that serve very elaborate feasts every week, with lavish food and abundant drink, like the banquets of Achashveirosh in his time. Why? ?In the face of dwindling attendance?the sumptuous food, fine wines and liquors are a way to help draw congregants.? Whatever it takes, I guess. Thousands upon thousands of dollars are spent per week on food and alcohol, with faithful Jews their enthusiastic consumers. No tuition ?crisis? there.
In one shul, the rabbi has an ?adviser on food and drink.? In another, a dedicated volunteer brings a gigantic bottle of $500 Scotch every Friday afternoon. In still another, the rabbi boasted about the ?quality whiskey? served in his community: ?the perception is, the more expensive the bottle, the more prestigious the Kiddush.? Not to be outdone, a Conservative rabbinic leader claimed, in essence, that Conservative Jews are just as good (or bad) as the Orthodox. ?Finding a really good kiddush ? that?s a blood sport in the Jewish community,? he said. At least he had the good sense to decry the ?cult of alcohol? that exists in our world. One non-Jewish on-line commentator asked: ?Where do I go to convert??
It is fascinating that not one person I spoke to ? within and without our community ? was not embarrassed by the article, even people who drink alcohol. Moreover, I know that some of the rabbis quoted were horrified by how they were made to sound, and didn?t quote grasp the gist of where the reporter was going. And it is hard to resist the lure of being quoted in the newspapers, especially prestigious ones.
Rabbi Heshy Weinrib found ?very upsetting? the nonstop orgy under the guise of spirituality, and Rabbi Heshy Billet spoke about people in his shul in years past leaving davening to drink, and coming back drunk and loud, and so liquor was banned. Period. Even for Kiddush. The article drily notes: ?Some members left in protest.? Big loss, I?m sure. But the most telling statement was by Professor Jonathan Sarna of Brandeis, who said: ?Once upon a time, some people went to synagogue to talk to G-d. Nowadays, more and more people come to see their friends. The prayers and sermons are a distraction. Conviviality goes better with a drink.? Is he right? It certainly seems so.
We can yell ?Kiddush, Kiddush? as much as we want and think it is somehow rooted in holiness, and exult ?l?chaim? and think liquor is really life; we can speak until we are blue in the face about the ?mitzvot? we can fulfill with wine and liquor; we can preach about the importance of Kiruv (Jewish outreach) whatever the methodology used ? even if underage college students are plied with free liquor to induce them to participate in ?Jewish? activities; and we can really believe that what is most critical in shuls is getting bodies into seats and dues being paid. But what is missing from all this is one word ?God. Where is G-d in all this? What does any of this have to do with G-d?
This travesty sheds light on verses from the tragic vision of Yeshayahu that have always troubled me: ?Why do I need your numerous sacrifices? G-d says. I am satiated with ram-offerings and the choicest of fattened animals?? (Yeshayahu 1:11) Traditionally, we understand the problem as insincerity ? as bringing offerings in the Temple in a mechanical way, without repentance or genuine commitment. But that is true of the Korban Chatat or asham or even some olot (sin-, trespass-, or ascent-offerings) but what does that have to do with shelamim ? with peace-offerings that are brought on festive occasions or as personal expressions of gratitude? There is no repentance or sincerity required for shelamim! So why did the prophet castigate those as well ? what he referred to as the ?fattened calves??
The answer is that even shelamim require at least an acknowledgment of G-d and recognition of the holiness of the Temple. Indeed, the Bet HaMikdash also hosted a perpetual feast. Many of the offerings brought had to be consumed pursuant to a rigid system ? a day and a night for some, or two days and a night for others. They had to be eaten in the vicinity of the Temple, so, in fact, in the Temple and its environs, people were always eating and drinking. But they came to ?seek out G-d?s presence? (Devarim 12:5); to come to the Bet HaMikdash for the purpose of eating and drinking? For that the prophet admonished us in the harshest terms: ?Who asked you to come and trample My courtyards?? (Yeshayahu 1:12). Indeed, who asked them to come? Apparently, G-d does not want them there ? even for kiruv purposes, even to put bodies in seats, even to attract attention in newspapers. For the end result of such an edifice is churban ? destruction. The building does not last, because it does not deserve to last.
King Shlomo stated (Mishlei 15:8) that ?the offering of the wicked is an abomination to G-d,? and the Vilna Gaon commented here that ?offering? means shelamim, the peace-offering that is purely voluntary and not at all for atonement ? and yet it is still an abomination to G-d. But ?His desire is the prayer of the upright.? He continued (ibid 15:16): ?Even a little done with fear of G-d is better than a great abundance acquired with turmoil and commotion.? That is as true in life as it is for shuls and places of holiness. Quality matters more than quantity.
It is easy to build a shul: it is infinitely more difficult is to do it for the sake of Heaven, to serve only G-d and not man. That is much more complicated. Indeed, all people and all shuls struggle with the dichotomy between what is done and what is done ?l?shem shamayim ? in honest and heartfelt service of G-d. And all shuls wrestle with the dilemma that Professor Sarna highlighted ? how to strike a balance between the people who come to shul to talk to G-d and the people who come to see their friends, between those who see the shul as a place to daven and learn Torah, and those who see it as a social environment in which davening and learning are just two of several possible functions and activities.
All shuls struggle with that, even ours. We don?t always get it right ? but I like to think we are more successful than most, in keeping the lid on what is unsavory or at least frivolous and promoting what is most wholesome and virtuous ? what enriches the spirit and not the body ? even if that will not earn us front-page attention in the Wall Street Journal. The body finds it sustenance out there in the world, but the soul finds its enrichment in here, in the places designated for holiness. That is the uniqueness of a shul that is easily lost amid the cacophony of clinking glasses.
We drive away the divine presence when we sully His holy places and transform them into saloons that host prayer services. But we gain eternity and sanctity, and with it the spread of His presence, by focusing on true service of G-d and surrender to His will.

Like this:

Like Loading...

Source: http://rabbipruzansky.com/2013/02/21/cult-of-alcohol/

mad hatter azerbaijan ryan howard ps i love you ray charles cheney heart transplant weather san diego